[PDF] The New Dialectic: A Method of Evaluating an Argument Used for Some Purpose in a Given Case | Semantic Scholar (2024)

Skip to search formSkip to main contentSkip to account menu

Semantic ScholarSemantic Scholar's Logo
@inproceedings{Walton1999TheND, title={The New Dialectic: A Method of Evaluating an Argument Used for Some Purpose in a Given Case}, author={Douglas Walton}, year={1999}, url={https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:17531044}}
  • D. Walton
  • Published 1999
  • Philosophy

An exposition of developments in argumentation theory is presented that gives the reader a revealing glimpse into how the main methods that are being developed in that literature are being used.

21 Citations

Highly Influential Citations

1

Background Citations

10

Methods Citations

1

Topics

Arguments (opens in a new tab)Explanation (opens in a new tab)Dialogue (opens in a new tab)Argumentation Theory (opens in a new tab)Sequence (opens in a new tab)Inference (opens in a new tab)Presumptive Arguments (opens in a new tab)

21 Citations

Proof Burdens and Standards
    T. GordonD. Walton

    Law, Computer Science

    Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence

  • 2009

This chapter explains the role of proof burdens and standards in argumentation, illustrates them using legal procedures, and surveys the history of research on computational models of these concepts.

  • 132
  • PDF
Fallacies as Argumentative Devices in Political Debates
    V. ZurloniL. Anolli

    Political Science

    Political Speech

  • 2010

The findings demonstrate how several informal fallacies are strategically used by politicians in order to put forward coherent and strong positions.

  • 9
Argument Continuities in theory and practice
    O. Pimenova

    Political Science

    Journal of Argumentation in Context

  • 2022

Argumentation on some public policy issues is conjugated with disagreement and power differentials. Institutionally dominant arguers control the argumentation context through imposing authority

  • 2
Rationality, reasonableness and informal logic: A case study of Chaim Perelman
    Rongdong JinC. Tindale

    Philosophy

  • 2011

Perelman’s discussion about the distinction and relation between the rational and the reasonable could be seen as an attempt to bring forward a new understanding of rationality. In light of the

  • PDF
Understanding the Social II – Philosophy of Sociality
    G. Preyer

    Philosophy, Political Science

  • 2003

In this paper we will study two central social notions, acting as a group member and collective commitment. Our study of the first of these notions is – as far as we know – the first systematic work

  • 1
The Nature of Pre-service Science Teachers’ Argumentation in Inquiry-oriented Laboratory Context
    Y. OzdemH. ErtepınarJ. ÇakıroğluS. Erduran

    Education

  • 2013

The aim of this study was to investigate the kinds of argumentation schemes generated by pre-service elementary science teachers (PSTs) as they perform inquiry-oriented laboratory tasks, and to

  • 96
  • PDF
The Value of Topoi
    J. Zompetti

    Education, Philosophy

  • 2006

Despite Vancil’s (1979) proclamation over twenty years ago that topoi have been abandoned in argument theory, this essay contends that topoi should have a vital role in contemporary argumentation

  • 28
Integrating Social and Psychological Perspectives on Writing as a Learning Activity
    Perry D. Klein

    Education, Psychology

    Conocer la Escritura: Investigaci�n M�s All� de…

  • 2019

Both the psychological perspective and the social perspective on writing have been demonstrably successful theoretically, empirically, and pedagogically. The goal of this paper is to show that these

  • 1
  • PDF
Dominant Discourse in Indigenous Consultations
    O. Pimenova

    Political Science

    International Journal on Minority and Group…

  • 2022

In Canada, consulting with Indigenous communities over recourse projects, the Crown sometimes avoids critical engagement with them, holding to the same arguments and counterarguments through

  • PDF
Teaching Argument and Explanation to Prepare Junior Students for Writing to Learn
    Perry D. KleinM. Rose

    Philosophy

  • 2010

The purpose of this project was to develop theoretical constructs and instructional design elements related to improving students' ability to learn through writing. The authors used a design

  • 73

...

...

32 References

The New Dialectic: Conversational Contexts of Argument
    D. Walton

    Philosophy

  • 1998

By reaching back to the Aristotelian roots of logic as an applied, practical discipline and by formulating a new framework of rationality for evaluating arguments, Douglas Walton restores a much-needed balance to argument analysis.

  • 460
Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce
    C. HartshorneP. Weiss

    Philosophy, Mathematics

    Nature

  • 1935

IT is difficult to deal adequately, even in a longer notice, with the extraordinary diversity of topics touched upon or discussed in these volumes. They fully support the editor's opinion that Peirce

  • 3,600
  • PDF
A Logic for Default Reasoning
    R. Reiter

    Computer Science

    Artif. Intell.

  • 1980
  • 4,432
  • PDF
The development of logic
    W. KnealeM. Kneale

    Philosophy

  • 1962

The primary purpose of this book has not been to recount all that past scholars have said about the science, but rather to record the first appearances of those ideas which seem most important in the

  • 1,269
Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning
    D. WaltonE. Krabbe

    Psychology

  • 1995

Thank you very much for reading commitment in dialogue basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning. As you may know, people have look hundreds times for their favorite readings like this commitment in

  • 1,284
The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation
    Ch. PerelmanLucie Olbrechts-TytecaJ. WilkinsonP. Weaver

    Philosophy

  • 1971
  • 2,899
Nonmonotonic Reasoning
    Alexander Bochman

    Computer Science

    We Will Show Them!

  • 2005
  • 540
  • PDF
Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning
    D. Walton

    Philosophy

  • 1995

Contents: Preface. Introduction. Presumptive Reasoning. The Argumentation Schemes. Argument from Ignorance. Ignoring Qualifications. Argument from Consequences.

  • 1,009
Abductive inference : computation, philosophy, technology
    J. JosephsonS. G. Josephson

    Computer Science, Philosophy

  • 1994

This work focuses on the development of knowledge-based systems and the science of AI in the area of abduction, with a focus on two RED systems.

  • 554

...

...

Related Papers

Showing 1 through 3 of 0 Related Papers

    [PDF] The New Dialectic: A Method of Evaluating an Argument Used for Some Purpose in a Given Case | Semantic Scholar (2024)

    FAQs

    What is the dialectic method? ›

    The dialectical method is the method of discussion that refers to coming up with answers through the medium of the logical and reasonable discourse of arguments, keeping in mind that no disrespectful arguments are made; it is a discussion between different entities about their point of view.

    What is a dialectical approach in an argument? ›

    Dialectic (Greek: διαλεκτική, dialektikḗ; German: Dialektik), also known as the dialectical method, refers originally to dialogue between people holding different points of view about a subject but wishing to arrive at the truth through reasoned argumentation.

    What is the dialectic method of Plato? ›

    Dialectic is the name Plato gives to his method, to the highest form of thought. In dialectic one examines one's assumptions, one's basic concepts, and one arrives at better assumptions and concepts. It is perfectly possible, for Plato, that one would not, for the moment, examine one's concepts.

    What is the Socrates dialectical method? ›

    The Socratic dialectic, also called the Socratic method or dialectical method of Socrates, is a type of dialogue in which individuals argue with the cooperative intent of refining their thinking and reaching a more sound conclusion.

    What are 5 examples of dialectic method? ›

    Examples of Dialectics in Therapy
    1. I am strong…yet vulnerable.
    4. You can be intelligent…and lack self-awareness.
    5. I want to change…and I'm afraid to change.
    6. You are happy with yourself…and want to improve.
    7. I'm doing the best I can…and I need to try harder.
    20 more rows
    Oct 12, 2021

    What is the difference between the Socratic method and the dialectic method? ›

    Answer & Explanation. Dialectic is a method of philosophical discussion that involves opposing viewpoints to arrive at a logical conclusion. The Socratic dialogue is a specific form of dialectic that involves questioning and examining beliefs to arrive at a deeper understanding.

    What is an example of a dialectical approach? ›

    A dialectic is when two seemingly conflicting things are true at the same time. For example, “It's snowing and it is spring”. You might also see dialectics when in conflict with other people. I like to think of it as having an elephant in the room with two blindfolded people on opposite ends of the elephant.

    What is a dialectic in layman's terms? ›

    Dialectic is a formal system of reasoning that arrives at the truth through the exchange of logical arguments. Dialectic is a process of examining an issue using very careful steps.

    What is the difference between dialectic and argument? ›

    Debate is a competition, a head to head where you try to bend the will of someone else towards your way of thinking, trying to change their mind by force of argument. Dialectic is a philosophic exercise where two intelligent people discuss a topic together to try and find the truth.

    What is the dialectic method of Aristotle? ›

    Dialectic is a method of investigation which has enjoyed a long history and has been invoked and involved in a great variety of intellectual causes. Aristotle was one of the first thinkers to develop a full theory of dialectic, and his account has remained one of the most influential and philosophically substantial.

    What is dialectic according to Hegel? ›

    Hegel identified dialectic as the tendency of a notion to pass over into its own negation as the result of conflict between its inherent contradictory aspects. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels adopted Hegel's definition and applied it to social and economic processes. See also dialectical materialism.

    What is a dialectic theory? ›

    Dialectical Theory has its roots in the Chinese philosophy of Yin and Yang -- i.e., all aspects of the universe contains the seeds of its opposites -- as well as the Western philosophy that the world is in constant flux (change), with creative and destructive forces constantly operating upon each other.

    Who is the father of the dialectical method? ›

    According to Hegel, Heracl*tus was the founder of Dialectic method. His method of Dialectics can be explained by way of two theories - theory of flux and theory of unity of opposites. He famously said – one cannot step into the same river twice and the one exists and does not exist.

    What is the dialectical method Karl Marx? ›

    Dialectical materialism is an approach for explaining the transition from capitalism to socialism. Derived from the writings of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, dialectical materialism explains economic revolution as a function of society and the interaction between capital and labor.

    What are the five Socratic questions? ›

    Types and Examples of Socratic questions
    • Why do you say that?
    • What do you mean by…?
    • How does this relate to our discussion?
    • What do you think is the main issue?
    • Could you expand upon that point further?

    What is the dialectic decision method? ›

    The Dialectical Inquiry Decision-Making Technique. Dialectical inquiry requires active preparation from everyone involved in the decision. The group is divided into two subgroups, and each subgroup develops a set of assumptions and recommendations that oppose each other.

    What is the dialectic method according to Karl Marx? ›

    For Marx, dialectics is not a formula for generating predetermined outcomes but is a method for the empirical study of social processes in terms of interrelations, development, and transformation.

    What is the dialectical method of learning? ›

    A Model of Dialectical Learning. The model of dialectical learning focuses on individual learning. In the context of using the DI method, the use of debate groups serves as the learning source while the strategic decision-maker is the learning recipient.

    References

    Top Articles
    Latest Posts
    Article information

    Author: Foster Heidenreich CPA

    Last Updated:

    Views: 5591

    Rating: 4.6 / 5 (56 voted)

    Reviews: 87% of readers found this page helpful

    Author information

    Name: Foster Heidenreich CPA

    Birthday: 1995-01-14

    Address: 55021 Usha Garden, North Larisa, DE 19209

    Phone: +6812240846623

    Job: Corporate Healthcare Strategist

    Hobby: Singing, Listening to music, Rafting, LARPing, Gardening, Quilting, Rappelling

    Introduction: My name is Foster Heidenreich CPA, I am a delightful, quaint, glorious, quaint, faithful, enchanting, fine person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.