DVD Talk Forum - Guardians of the Galaxy Volume 3 (2023, D: Gunn) - (2024)

Page 6 of 7

« First

<

4

5

6

7

>

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page


DVD Talk Forum(https://forum.dvdtalk.com/)

- Movie Talk(https://forum.dvdtalk.com/movie-talk-17/)

- - Guardians of the Galaxy Volume 3 (2023, D: Gunn) -- The Spoiler Reviews Thread(https://forum.dvdtalk.com/movie-talk/657697-guardians-galaxy-volume-3-2023-d-gunn-spoiler-reviews-thread.html)


Why So Blu?08-06-23 10:55 AM

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy Volume 3 (2023, D: Gunn) -- The Spoiler Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by JeremyM(Post 14305788)

Since this was released to Disney + the same day as the physical release, it really seems that Disney is just about done with physical media. A shame if so.

They are done with physical media in Australia. GoG is the last disc to be sold there.


RocShemp08-06-23 12:53 PM

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy Volume 3 (2023, D: Gunn) -- The Spoiler Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Why So Blu?(Post 14305800)

They are done with physical media in Australia. GoG is the last disc to be sold there.

Sign of the times. I know I've said it before, and must sound like a broken record at this point, but I wish physical media player manufacturers (Panasonic, Sony, LG, etc) would start making Kaleidescape style players while the different streaming services would sell 4K downloads of their movies and TV shows that would require said players, whilst also catering to their customer base that's perfectly happy with streaming. Best of both worlds, really (with your "physical" media space only being limited by the amount of HDD storage you have).


tanman08-06-23 10:59 PM

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy Volume 3 (2023, D: Gunn) -- The Spoiler Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Why So Blu?(Post 14305800)

They are done with physical media in Australia. GoG is the last disc to be sold there.

Yeah I'm really starting to freak out about the coming landscape of media. I don't know exactly what it will look like but I know it will be a lot less consumer friendly.


Josh-da-man08-07-23 04:03 AM

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy Volume 3 (2023, D: Gunn) -- The Spoiler Reviews Thread

The big studios will eventually shutter their home media divisions.

Disney will probably be the first one, and the last holdout will be either Warners or Paramount.

All new releases will either be streaming or digital purchases.

If we're lucky, instead of producing discs in-house, they'll allow boutique publishers like Shout, Arrow, and Criterion to license and release to the collectors market.


Troy Stiffler08-07-23 11:12 AM

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy Volume 3 (2023, D: Gunn) -- The Spoiler Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Josh-da-man(Post 14306042)

If we're lucky, instead of producing discs in-house, they'll allow boutique publishers like Shout, Arrow, and Criterion to license and release to the collectors market.

That sounds great. Leave it up to the film fans to seek out boutique collections.

I do miss the commentary tracks. I don't miss the clutter.


The Questyen08-07-23 11:50 AM

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy Volume 3 (2023, D: Gunn) -- The Spoiler Reviews Thread

Finally watched it this weekend and it was everything I could have hoped for. The first 2 GOTG movies are my favorite MCU movies and this finale was the best of the three. Great mix of heart and comedy. Loved it.


Abob Teff08-07-23 08:33 PM

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy Volume 3 (2023, D: Gunn) -- The Spoiler Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by RocShemp(Post 14305829)

Sign of the times. I know I've said it before, and must sound like a broken record at this point, but I wish physical media player manufacturers (Panasonic, Sony, LG, etc) would start making Kaleidescape style players while the different streaming services would sell 4K downloads of their movies and TV shows that would require said players, whilst also catering to their customer base that's perfectly happy with streaming. Best of both worlds, really (with your "physical" media space only being limited by the amount of HDD storage you have).

So … DIVX without the discs?


ntnon08-08-23 10:20 PM

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy Volume 3 (2023, D: Gunn) -- The Spoiler Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by mwbmis(Post 14275673)

Two observations though...I think in character Nebula would no longer be that angry. She spent five years with Rocket as an Avenger creating real friendships. Sure she would still a surly character, but some of her more angry outbursts rang a little false for me. Second, the ending where everyone goes their separate ways felt more like something that happened because Gunn and some of the actors were leaving than it did something the characters would do..

I agree - and I'll go further none of the characters seemed to have learned or changed much over our time with them. Drax has gone backwards - from naive to stupid - and I tend to assume that Groot is a new version too, because his 'growth' from stick to teenager has been disappointly trite.

We know that Peter has a mask with which he can breathe in space. We know that the Ravagers havs clones of his music. So.. how did he wind up risking his life for his Zune without his mask? The High Evolutionary had force-like powers that allowed him to kill several henchmen. Adam Warlock could defeat the GotG individually and was working for the HE. How could those two manage to lose to the Guardians? Why was Rocket OK with gunning down 'evolved' and brainwashed lackeys, but keen to rescue literal animals?

The music choices were nowhere near as good as in Vol. 1, and were weirdly shoehorned in too. And I hope Gunn doesn't bring his tendancy to run jokes into the ground (e.g. the unripe vegetable in V2, the 'bad dog' in V3) over to Superman..


ntnon08-08-23 10:42 PM

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy Volume 3 (2023, D: Gunn) -- The Spoiler Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Abob Teff(Post 14305226)

.. the Gamora he is lusting after is NOT the Gamora he knows. To put it another way, she is Gamor-B, not Gamor-A.

Not quite, though. They're both the same Gamora with the same childhood and history, just at a different age. She's Gamora-A(minus 2-11yrs)

He met Gamora in.. 2014ish, by which point she'd been chaffing under Thanos' tutelage and influence for some time and literally just decided to betray him. So G2012 isn't quite at that point yet, but it desn't take much from futureNebula to convince her it's what she will do.

Now, 2014G isn't immediately in love with Quill, but the friendship and attraction is evident very swiftly. He does not have that bond with 2012G (never saved her in the Kiln, etc.) but she IS the person he fell in love with, and he has to wonder whether similar bonding experiences will lead her to see him similarly also.

A bigger point is that, while 2012G is two years younger than the 2014G he met in GotG v1, she's brought into the Endgame future of 2023. So there's a definite time gap - and maybe age gap - issue above and beyond their lack of shared experiences.


JeremyM08-09-23 11:02 AM

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy Volume 3 (2023, D: Gunn) -- The Spoiler Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by ntnon(Post 14306901)

I agree - and I'll go further none of the characters seemed to have learned or changed much over our time with them. Drax has gone backwards - from naive to stupid - and I tend to assume that Groot is a new version too, because his 'growth' from stick to teenager has been disappointly trite.

We know that Peter has a mask with which he can breathe in space. We know that the Ravagers havs clones of his music. So.. how did he wind up risking his life for his Zune without his mask? The High Evolutionary had force-like powers that allowed him to kill several henchmen. Adam Warlock could defeat the GotG individually and was working for the HE. How could those two manage to lose to the Guardians? Why was Rocket OK with gunning down 'evolved' and brainwashed lackeys, but keen to rescue literal animals?

The music choices were nowhere near as good as in Vol. 1, and were weirdly shoehorned in too. And I hope Gunn doesn't bring his tendancy to run jokes into the ground (e.g. the unripe vegetable in V2, the 'bad dog' in V3) over to Superman..

The first Groot died in Volume One, this is a new one grown from the old one.


RocShemp08-10-23 12:01 AM

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy Volume 3 (2023, D: Gunn) -- The Spoiler Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Abob Teff(Post 14306429)

So … DIVX without the discs?

Wow, that's a blast from the past! Remember how there was DivX and DIVX at the same time? That led to some really confusing conversations back in the day.

But, no, I was thinking of a more affordable version of this.
​​​​​​

Originally Posted by ntnon(Post 14306901)

We know that Peter has a mask with which he can breathe in space. We know that the Ravagers havs clones of his music. So.. how did he wind up risking his life for his Zune without his mask?

The more I think about this movie, the more I dislike it. However, the idiocy with Quill not using his breathing mask notwithstanding, I felt the deal with Zune was with regards to the hardware itself. It was the last gift he received from his recently deceased dad, Yandu. That's why Quill took such a reckless risk. So that scene (except for the lack of the aforementioned mask) does make sense.


Draven08-10-23 09:44 AM

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy Volume 3 (2023, D: Gunn) -- The Spoiler Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by RocShemp(Post 14307441)

The more I think about this movie, the more I dislike it. However, the idiocy with Quill not using his breathing mask notwithstanding, I felt the deal with Zune was with regards to the hardware itself. It was the last gift he received from his recently deceased dad, Yandu. That's why Quill took such a reckless risk. So that scene (except for the lack of the aforementioned mask) does make sense.

Gunn says he didn't have his mask. Peter doesn't use it at all in the movie so this makes more sense than if he had it earlier but didn't use it for the spacewalk:


Michael Corvin08-10-23 06:55 PM

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy Volume 3 (2023, D: Gunn) -- The Spoiler Reviews Thread

Yeah that was one of my overall peeves about this film. 3 hours of Peter Quill and no Star Lord.


RocShemp08-10-23 06:58 PM

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy Volume 3 (2023, D: Gunn) -- The Spoiler Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Draven(Post 14307525)

Gunn says he didn't have his mask. Peter doesn't use it at all in the movie so this makes more sense than if he had it earlier but didn't use it for the spacewalk:

https://twitter.com/JamesGunn/status...681965568?s=20

I get the vibe that's just a snarky response and the real reason is Gunn simply goofed. It happens to everyone.


Draven08-10-23 10:21 PM

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy Volume 3 (2023, D: Gunn) -- The Spoiler Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by RocShemp(Post 14307743)

I get the vibe that's just a snarky response and the real reason is Gunn simply goofed. It happens to everyone.

Gunn didn’t put Peter in his helmet at any point in the entire movie because of a goof?


RocShemp08-11-23 06:26 PM

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy Volume 3 (2023, D: Gunn) -- The Spoiler Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Draven(Post 14307825)

Gunn didn’t put Peter in his helmet at any point in the entire movie because of a goof?

No. I'm saying Gunn forgot the helmet when he wrote/shot that sequence.

Stupid sh*t like that happens all the time in movies. Just look at how they had to CGI Daniel Craig's hands for the whole Shanghai sequence in Skyfall, just because it didn't occur to anyone until the movie was being edited that Bond wearing gloves would mean he'd never be able to use the hand print scanner on the the gun Q gave him.


Draven08-11-23 08:47 PM

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy Volume 3 (2023, D: Gunn) -- The Spoiler Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by RocShemp(Post 14308191)

No. I'm saying Gunn forgot the helmet when he wrote/shot that sequence.

Wouldn’t it be more convenient for Peter to apparently have his helmet on the whole movie but only use it at the end?

You’d have a better argument that Gunn forgot if Peter had used it in the film already.


Abob Teff08-11-23 08:56 PM

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy Volume 3 (2023, D: Gunn) -- The Spoiler Reviews Thread

It's in his desk drawer? The thing that nanotechs itself down to nothingness behind his ear?

Lame. When did we leave the timeline from GOTG and GOTG2 to end up with these doppelgangers? Sorry, I don't think any of the characters here are the same characters as the last two movies.


RocShemp08-11-23 09:55 PM

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy Volume 3 (2023, D: Gunn) -- The Spoiler Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Draven(Post 14308221)

Wouldn’t it be more convenient for Peter to apparently have his helmet on the whole movie but only use it at the end?

You’d have a better argument that Gunn forgot if Peter had used it in the film already.

There really wasn't any other sequence where Quill would need his helmet (more a mask, really, since the top of his head remains exposed when he wears it in the previous movies). You could maybe argue he should have used it when they infiltrated Orgocorp, but it was clearly ignored to accommodate the comms buttons gag.

Originally Posted by Abob Teff(Post 14308223)

It's in his desk drawer? The thing that nanotechs itself down to nothingness behind his ear?

Which is why I think Gunn's "explanation" is nothing more than a snarky/joke answer.


Draven08-11-23 10:29 PM

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy Volume 3 (2023, D: Gunn) -- The Spoiler Reviews Thread

I just don’t think everyone involved got through the entire movie without remembering that Peter has a helmet. Instead, he literally doesn’t have the helmet for the entire movie.


RocShemp08-12-23 02:41 AM

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy Volume 3 (2023, D: Gunn) -- The Spoiler Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Draven(Post 14308261)

I just don’t think everyone involved got through the entire movie without remembering that Peter has a helmet. Instead, he literally doesn’t have the helmet for the entire movie.

As I mentioned before, these things happen. Again I refer you to Skyfall. There's a whole scene where Q is introduced and hands Bond a gun that's only functional if it registers Bond's hand print and a mini radio. Both these items are used during separate key sequences later on. One such sequence involves a gag where a random henchman gets a hold of Bond's gun but is unable to discharge it. However, neither Sam Mendes, Daniel Craig (whose idea it was for Bond to wear a pair of leather gloves), the script supervisor, the writers, or anyone else in the crew on the day of shooting realised that Bond wouldn't be able to use the gun either. This is a large sequence and would be very expensive to reshoot so CGI was used as a last minute fix.

That was a large budget film with a massive error brought on by simple forgetfulness. You think Gunn couldn't have had a similar brain fart? Do you seriously believe that Peter Quill left his nanotech breathing mask in a desk drawer, with not so much as an establishing shot to point out he left it behind, if it indeed was meant to be a key reason why he didn't have with him a key piece of gear that is practically synonymous with him? That's like Captain America forgetting his shield, Thor forgetting his hammer, or Spider-Man forgetting his web shooters.


GoldenJCJ08-12-23 08:56 AM

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy Volume 3 (2023, D: Gunn) -- The Spoiler Reviews Thread

I finally watched this last night. I really enjoyed it. It’s definitely the best post-Endgame MCU so far.

I’m also not likely to remember a single thing about it in a couple months.


Draven08-12-23 09:15 AM

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy Volume 3 (2023, D: Gunn) -- The Spoiler Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by RocShemp(Post 14308322)

That was a large budget film with a massive error brought on by simple forgetfulness. You think Gunn couldn't have had a similar brain fart? Do you seriously believe that Peter Quill left his nanotech breathing mask in a desk drawer, with not so much as an establishing shot to point out he left it behind, if it indeed was meant to be a key reason why he didn't have with him a key piece of gear that is practically synonymous with him? That's like Captain America forgetting his shield, Thor forgetting his hammer, or Spider-Man forgetting his web shooters.

The Skyfall example is just a blooper. A big one, but just a blooper.

What you’re basically saying is “why didn’t Captain America use his shield?” at the end of the movie when he didn’t have his shield at all at any point prior to the end of the movie.


RocShemp08-12-23 09:33 AM

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy Volume 3 (2023, D: Gunn) -- The Spoiler Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Draven(Post 14308370)

The Skyfall example is just a blooper. A big one, but just a blooper.

What you’re basically saying is “why didn’t Captain America use his shield?” at the end of the movie when he didn’t have his shield at all at any point prior to the end of the movie.

Okay then why didn't Peter have his helmet? Did the movie at any point make so much as passing mention as to why he didn't have a key part of his character? Because when Cap didn't use his shield in Avengers: Infinity War, it was made crystal clear to the audience he no longer had it ("get this man a shield!"). That's the absence of a key item that is clearly addressed in the movie because it is ubiquitous to the character and affects said character's actions when in combat or peril. Keep in mind, however, that Gunn destroyed Quill's helmet in GotG2 (which is why Yondu had to sacrifice himself in that movie). It was the Russo Bros that introduced the new nanotech helmet. And Gunn has mentioned in the past that the Russos did things with the GotG cast he never would (presumably the death of Gamora being one such decision) but he rolled with them. It stands to reason, however, that he would simply have forgotten that the Russo Bros gave Quill a new helmet.


Michael Corvin08-12-23 02:54 PM

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy Volume 3 (2023, D: Gunn) -- The Spoiler Reviews Thread

Cap's shield is a bad example though as it's a physical item he carries around. For two movies (and team ups) Peter's helmet is some techno wizardry that's always on him. He pushes a button and it appears out of nowhere on his head. It's not a halloween mask he carries around with him in a shoulder bag.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:52 AM.

Page 6 of 7

« First

<

4

5

6

7

>

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.

DVD Talk Forum -  Guardians of the Galaxy Volume 3 (2023, D: Gunn) - (2024)

FAQs

What will Guardians of the Galaxy Vol 3 be about? ›

Is Guardians of the Galaxy Vol 3 Sad? ›

Rocket's backstory is also very disturbing, and the villain is very scary. Please note that GotG 3 is very sad, and will make you cry.

Did James Gunn wrote Guardians of the Galaxy 3? ›

Summary. James Gunn faced numerous challenges while writing the script for Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3, despite his experience in crafting narratives that blend humor with heart. Marvel Studios did not interfere with Gunn's vision for the film, and he had to rely on sheer willpower to complete the writing process.

How long is Guardians of the Galaxy Volume Three? ›

Settle in for an epic. Guardians of the Galaxy Vol 3 is out now in cinemas to bring the MCU trilogy to an epic conclusion and for that finale, the movie has delivered the longest Guardians outing to date. The new movie runs for a confirmed 149 minutes and 51 seconds, or nearly two-and-a-half hours.

Will there be a vol 4 of Guardians of the Galaxy? ›

In plainer English, this means there will be no Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 4, or at least not one that will be anything like the first three. For further proof, when asked by fans if there were any plans for a Vol. 4, Gunn flat out stated that there were none.

What happened to Drax in Guardians of the Galaxy 3? ›

Drax the Destroyer is no longer a Guardian of the Galaxy by the end of “Vol 3.” He stays behind on Knowhere to help Nebula protect the population, which sees an influx of children and animals rescued from the High Evolutionary's ship.

Who is the dying mother in Guardians of the Galaxy? ›

She was ultimately killed by Ego after he planted a tumor in her head that activated her brain cancer. Meredith is portrayed by Laura Haddock.

Why did people cry at Guardians of the Galaxy 3? ›

Whether it's Rocket Raccoon's harrowing backstory or the fact that Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 marks the end of an era, viewers will definitely find themselves tearing up during the film. Vol. 3 treated fans to many wholesome and heartwarming scenes, but also numerous upsetting and sad moments.

Can a 7 year old watch Guardians of the Galaxy 3? ›

For these reasons the movie is unsuitable for children under 13 and we recommend parental guidance for children from 13-14 years. The main messages from Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 are to look after those who are dear to you, and not to bow to the influence of evil.

Will Star-Lord return? ›

Marvel Studios has already promised more Star-Lord

At the end of 2023's Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3, Peter Quill — now apparently retired from saving the galaxy — returns to Earth and reunites with his grandfather, with the post-credits scene showing them enjoying a quiet breakfast together.

Who is the girl at the end of Guardians of the Galaxy 3? ›

Phyla, a new character from the original Marvel Comics, is introduced in Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 and becomes a member of the new Guardians of the Galaxy team. Phyla's significance is revealed in the post-credits scene, where she joins the new team led by Rocket.

Why did James Gunn come back? ›

"I had to think about it." "But the thing that made me come back was, of course, my cast, who have supported me so much throughout all of this," Gunn continued. "But really, the thing was, I just needed to finish Rocket's story. I knew that he had a story that I had in mind from the beginning.

What is Star Lord's name? ›

Peter Jason Quill, also known by his alias Star-Lord, is a fictional character portrayed primarily by Chris Pratt in the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) media franchise, based on the Marvel Comics character of the same name.

Was Miley Cyrus in Guardians of the Galaxy? ›

Miley Cyrus participated in 'Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2' in the role of Mainframe, but the star did not reprise her role in the third instalment of the successful Marvel movies. Instead, it was Tara Strong who voiced the character for that third movie.

Was Guardians of the Galaxy 3 any good? ›

Absolutely phenomenal in my opinion. Guardians of the Galaxy 3 was not only super emotional (after Endgame I'd say the most emotional Marvel movie), the CGI and the action scenes were incredibly good as well. In some scenes it was super messed up and weird, but exactly these scenes made the movie so good.

Why is Guardians 3 so dark? ›

Guardian 3's more mature tone was a topic that Gunn had previously talked about in 2022, commenting at the time that the film's "so, so big and dark and different from what people might be expecting it to be." Gunn also delved into why GotG 3 is so long, remarking that it was "necessary to experience the full arc for ...

Is Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 a good movie? ›

Absolutely phenomenal in my opinion. Guardians of the Galaxy 3 was not only super emotional (after Endgame I'd say the most emotional Marvel movie), the CGI and the action scenes were incredibly good as well. In some scenes it was super messed up and weird, but exactly these scenes made the movie so good.

Who is the next villain in Guardians of the Galaxy 3? ›

Played by Chukwudi Iwuji, who reunites with director/writer James Gunn (the two worked on HBO Max's Peacemaker together), the High Evolutionary of the MCU is a massive threat to the Guardians, giving them a decidedly personal mission after his schemes injure Rocket (Bradley Cooper).

What does the end of Guardians of the Galaxy 3 mean? ›

In terms of future stories, the ending of the film means that there is still a Guardians team at work in the MCU, meaning they are there to be called for help if needed. This could mean potentially big things for either Avengers: The Kang Dynasty or Avengers: Secret Wars.

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Msgr. Refugio Daniel

Last Updated:

Views: 6063

Rating: 4.3 / 5 (74 voted)

Reviews: 81% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Msgr. Refugio Daniel

Birthday: 1999-09-15

Address: 8416 Beatty Center, Derekfort, VA 72092-0500

Phone: +6838967160603

Job: Mining Executive

Hobby: Woodworking, Knitting, Fishing, Coffee roasting, Kayaking, Horseback riding, Kite flying

Introduction: My name is Msgr. Refugio Daniel, I am a fine, precious, encouraging, calm, glamorous, vivacious, friendly person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.